a survey on approaches for automatic fault detection in software
Clicks: 168
ID: 228806
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
168 views
24 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #60 of 103 articles by views in European journal of pharmacology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article is about the detection of failures in software. Several techniques of automatic fault detection reviewed: software probes, concurrent runtime monitoring, dynamic instrumentation and software supervision. A brief analysis of advantages and disadvantages of each method presented at the end of the article.
| Reference Key |
usenok2013bezopasnosta
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Andrey Aleksandrovich Usenok |
| Journal | European journal of pharmacology |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.