capacidade, dotação, talento, habilidades: uma sondagem da conceituação pelo ideário dos educadores ability, giftedness, talent, skills: a probe into the way these concepts are conceived, in teacher's minds
Clicks: 260
ID: 228343
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
260 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #13 of 52 articles by views in antioxidants
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Embora o escopo deste trabalho seja de origem teórica, relata um estudo exploratório que busca situar a base de conceituação em Educação Especial para alunos Dotados e Talentosos, no Brasil, captando as definições compreendidas por profissionais da educação pela sondagem de sua opinião sobre que termos e expressões são usados, com que significados e em que situações. Os sujeitos incluíam 80 educadores interessados ou envolvidos na área (Grupo A) e 107 professores da rede pública no interior de São Paulo (Grupo B). Há poucas diferenças de opinião entre os sujeitos, nos dois grupos, com algumas exceções, principalente em questões relacionadas a nível de conhecimento e familiaridade com referencial teórico. Ambos os grupos indicam conceituação confusa, notadamente para os termos oficiais, superdotação e altas-habilidades; a maior carga de rejeição e exploração na mídia é alocada a superdotação. Os conceitos alta capacidade, alto desempenho e dotação são definidos em consonância com o referencial básico, que diferencia capacidade natural de capacidade adquirida; Talento reflete a ambiguidade encontrada na área, referindo-se, ao mesmo tempo, a capacidade natural e capacidade adquirida.
The present study, while arising from a theoretical basis, is nonetheless, an exploratory study that attempts to identify the Basic Concepts of Special Education for is gifted and talented students of Brazil. The definitions and notions understood by the subjects, all professionals in the field of education, are captured by probing them, about their opinions on which terms and expressions are commonly used, with which meanings, and in which specific settings. The sample is comprised of 80 educators studying or involved within the area, (Group A), and 107 regular school teachers from a state school system in São Paulo State (Group B). Very few differences of opinion are registered between the two groups, save a few exceptions, mainly in relation to a knowledge of, and familiarity with, the theoretical framework. Both groups indicate conceptual confusion, in particular with the following official terms: super-giftedness and highly-skilled, with the largest rejection load (erroneous understanding) and also the highest media exploitation being allocated to the term, super-gifted. The concepts high ability, high performance and giftedness are defined according to the theoretical framework which differentiates natural ability from acquired ability; The word talent reflects the ambiguity encountered in the area, being referred to, at the same time, as natural ability and also as acquired ability.
The present study, while arising from a theoretical basis, is nonetheless, an exploratory study that attempts to identify the Basic Concepts of Special Education for is gifted and talented students of Brazil. The definitions and notions understood by the subjects, all professionals in the field of education, are captured by probing them, about their opinions on which terms and expressions are commonly used, with which meanings, and in which specific settings. The sample is comprised of 80 educators studying or involved within the area, (Group A), and 107 regular school teachers from a state school system in São Paulo State (Group B). Very few differences of opinion are registered between the two groups, save a few exceptions, mainly in relation to a knowledge of, and familiarity with, the theoretical framework. Both groups indicate conceptual confusion, in particular with the following official terms: super-giftedness and highly-skilled, with the largest rejection load (erroneous understanding) and also the highest media exploitation being allocated to the term, super-gifted. The concepts high ability, high performance and giftedness are defined according to the theoretical framework which differentiates natural ability from acquired ability; The word talent reflects the ambiguity encountered in the area, being referred to, at the same time, as natural ability and also as acquired ability.
| Reference Key |
guenther2012educaocapacidade,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Zenita Cunha Guenther;Carina Alexandra Rondini |
| Journal | antioxidants |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0102-46982012000100011
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.