icd discrimination of svt versus vt with 1:1 v-a conduction: a review of the literature
Clicks: 133
ID: 226884
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
7.5
/100
25 views
25 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Inappropriate ICD shocks are associated with increased mortality. They also impair patients' quality of life, increase hospitalizations, and raise health-care costs. Nearly 80% of inappropriate ICD shocks are caused by supraventricular tachycardia. Here we report the case of a patient who received a single-lead dual-chamber sensing ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death and experienced inappropriate ICD shocks. V-A time, electrogram morphology, and response to antitachycardia pacing suggested atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, which was confirmed in an electrophysiology study. Inspired by this case, we performed a literature review to discuss mechanisms for discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 A:V relationship from ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 retrograde conduction.
| Reference Key |
cardoso2015indianicd
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rhanderson N. Cardoso;Chris Healy;Juan Viles-Gonzalez;James O. Coffey |
| Journal | Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.ipej.2016.02.006
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.