de rationaliteit van de religieuze ervaring fide�sme en geloofsverantwoording
Clicks: 75
ID: 226699
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
22.2
/100
75 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #213 of 269 articles by views in BioMed research international
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 269 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article defends the rational nature of the religious experience of Transcendence. This is done by replacing the notion of the intentionality of experience advocated in Husserl�s phenomenology by that of the trans-intentionality of experience suggested by authors like Schleiermacher, Levinas and Marion and by refuting the accusation of fideism levelled against this latter approach.
| Reference Key |
stoker2004verbumde
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;W Stoker |
| Journal | BioMed research international |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.4102/ve.v25i2.294
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.