quantidade e qualidade na pesquisa em educação, na perspectiva da dialética marxista quantity and quality in research on education from the perspective of marxist dialectics

Clicks: 182
ID: 226448
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #19 of 33 articles by views in journal of synchrotron radiation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Este trabalho trata da relação entre métodos quantitativos e qualitativos nas ciências sociais em geral e na área da educação em particular. Começa focalizando a orientação positivista da Sociologia, assim como de outras ciências sociais em sua origem, mas rejeitando a identificação sumária entre métodos quantitativos e positivismo. Aborda, então, a querela metodológica, com destaque para três teses a respeito da relação entre métodos quantitativos e qualitativos: a da oposição ou incompatibilidade; a da complementaridade; e a da unidade. Esta última, como unidade na perspectiva da dialética marxista. Por fim, sugere que, em vez de nos inquirirmos sobre qual a competência metodológica de maior valor em absoluto, deveríamos perguntar-nos se e como diferentes competências metodológicas poderão articular-se no estudo de um determinado objeto ou problema social ou educacional.
This paper deals with the relationship between quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences in general and in the area of education in particular. It starts by focusing on the positivistic orientation that sociology and other social sciences had in their origin, but rejects a simple identification of quantitative methods and positivism. It then discusses the methodological dispute, highlighting three theses on the relationship between quantitative and qualitative methods: the thesis of opposition or incompatibility, the thesis of complementariness and the thesis of unity. The latter is seen as a unity in the perspective of Marxist dialectics. The paper finally suggests that instead of wondering what is the methodological competence that has the highest absolute value, we should ask whether and in which way different methodological competences can be brought together in the study of a particular object or social or educational problem.
Reference Key
ferraro2012pro-posiesquantidade Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Alceu Ravanello Ferraro
Journal journal of synchrotron radiation
Year 2012
DOI
10.1590/S0103-73072012000100009
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.