evasion and pursuit guidance law against defended target
Clicks: 102
ID: 225029
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
102 views
20 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #80 of 90 articles by views in Cancer epidemiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper investigates a new approach for a scenario in which an Attacker attempts to intercept a defended aerial Target. The problem is formulated as a game among three players, an Attacker, a Defender, and a Target, with bounded controls. In the considered pursuitâevasion problem, the Target uses an optimal evasion strategy and the Defender uses an optimal pursuit strategy. The proposed approach focuses on the miss distance as the outcome of the conflict. The infeasible region for the initial Zero-Effort-Miss (ZEM) distance between the Attacker and the Defender, for a scenario in which the Attacker evades the Defender, is analyzed, assuming that the Attacker uses a control effort chosen from the permitted control region. The sufficient conditions are investigated under which, for ideal players, the Attacker can pursue the Target while evading the Defender launched by the Target. The guidance provided on how the Attacker can accomplish the task is divided into two parts. During the final time between the Attacker and the Defender, the Attacker chooses the control effort that guarantees the miss distance, and then uses the optimal pursuit strategy to accomplish the task. The derived guidance law is verified by nonlinear simulation. Keywords: Evasion, Pursuit, Three players, Two parts guidance law, Zero-effort-miss
| Reference Key |
qi2017chineseevasion
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Naiming QI;Qilong SUN;Jun ZHAO |
| Journal | Cancer epidemiology |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.