fixed combination of lercanidipine and enalapril in the management of hypertension; focus on patient preference and adherence [corrigendum]
Clicks: 132
ID: 222519
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
132 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #61 of 79 articles by views in the journal of craniofacial surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Borghi C, Santi F.Patient Preference and Adherence. 2012;6:449–455. On page 452, Table 1: Effect of fixed association of enalapril–lercanidipine on blood pressure control. The Intervention column data for the 5th reference (Rump61) was incorrectly listed as: Enalapril 10 mg + lercanidipine 10 mg or enalapril 10 mg + lercanidipine 20 mg. The corrected data is:Enalapril 10 mg + lercanidipine 10 mg or enalapril 20 mg + lercanidipine 10 mg.Read the original article
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (63 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
c2013patientfixed
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Borghi C;Santi F |
| Journal | the journal of craniofacial surgery |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.