criminal liablilty of moral persons. comparative law and internal legislation issues
Clicks: 156
ID: 222511
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
156 views
45 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #43 of 54 articles by views in jmir medical informatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Considering that no doctrine or the legislation of various states where
such a liability has been implemented contains a consensus regarding the collective entities that could be criminally liable, the question whether the implementation of a general liability should be settled or exceptions may exist regarding certain categories of legal persons. Therefore, either on a legislative manner or on a jurisprudential one, the criminal liability of the state and other institutions that exercise public power duties is usually excluded.
| Reference Key |
marinescu2014annalscriminal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;CATALIN MARINESCU |
| Journal | jmir medical informatics |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.