bad bank and other possible banks’ rescuing models – the case of slovenia
Clicks: 139
ID: 222074
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
139 views
23 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #79 of 97 articles by views in kastamonu eğitim dergisi
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
During the economic crisis, Slovenia has transformed from one of the most successful new EU Member States
into one of the most problematic ones. The reason for this is largely extensive banking problems, that continue to cause
uncertainty on financial markets and adversely affect the rating of the country and consequently also the price of
borrowing for both the state and private entities. Slovenia has opted to rehabilitate its banking sector by means of a
bad bank (DUTB) that, however, only became operational at the end of 2013. The paper seeks to examine whether a
bad bank has indeed proven the most appropriate choice out of possible methods of resolving the banking crisis, based
on the most recent findings regarding the suitability of various methods of bailing out banking systems in crisis, taking
into consideration key elements required for the successful rehabilitation thereof. The paper finds that, taking into
consideration all relevant circumstances, the bad bank has proven to be appropriate solution in the Slovenian case but
the delay in rehabilitating the banking system has had significant negative macroeconomic impacts as demonstrated by
a comparison to other selected countries that had opted to bail out the banking sector before Slovenia. State ownership
of systemic banks and political instability have both greatly contributed to slow action taken.
| Reference Key |
markovic-hribernik2015analelebad
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;TANJA MARKOVIC-HRIBERNIK;MATEJ TOMEC |
| Journal | kastamonu eğitim dergisi |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.