kedudukan mahkamah adat setelah undang-undang tentang pemerintahan aceh

Clicks: 52
ID: 221921
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #34 of 38 articles by views in current medical research and opinion

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ABSTRAK. Lembaga adat di Aceh sebetulnya telah ada sebelum adanya UU tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Artikel ini dikaji dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sementara analisis data akan menggunakan teknik content analysis. Dari bahasan ditemukan bahwa dukungan utama kedudukan Mahkamah Adat dalam UU tentang Pemerintahan Aceh adalah Pasal 98 ayat (1), ayat (2), dan ayat (3) yang mengatur tentang lembaga adat dengan kewenangan menyelesaikan persengketaan masyarakat. Keberadaan mahkamah kemudian dipertegas dengan Qanun  Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 yang menguraikan tentang  prosedur dan struktur perangkat mahkamah adat, tata cara persidangan di mahkamah adat, jenis-jenis kasus yang dapat diselesaikan dan jenis hukuman yang dapat diberikan.   Adat Court Position After the Law on Government of Aceh   ABSTRACT. Customary institutions in Aceh actually existed before the Law on Government of Aceh. This article examined using normative juridical approach. While the data analysis will be using content analysis techniques. From the discussion it was found that the main support position the Adat Court in Law on Governing Aceh is Article 98 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3), which regulates the customs agency with the authority to resolve disputes society. The existence of the court then reaffirmed by Qanun No. 9 of 2008 which elaborates on the procedure and device structures customary tribunals, court proceedings in court custom, the types of cases that can be resolved and the type of punishment that can be given
Reference Key
mansur2016kanun:kedudukan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Teuku Muttaqin Mansur
Journal current medical research and opinion
Year 2016
DOI
10.24815/kanun.v18i2.5906
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.