the role of lifg-based executive control in recovery from garden-paths during sentence comprehension

Clicks: 312
ID: 221484
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #390 of 1,131 articles by views in accounts of chemical research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,131 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction Individuals with damage to the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) have difficulties when sentence comprehension depends on accessing a dispreferred word meaning or sentence structure, and these comprehension difficulties have been attributed to co-occurring deficits in executive control (e.g., Novick, Kan, Trueswell, & Thompson-Schill, 2009; Vuong & Martin, 2011). The present study further investigated the consequences of LIFG-based executive control deficits on comprehension by examining the role of verb bias on the ability to recover from an object/subject garden-path. We predicted that verb bias toward the inappropriate structure would magnify the syntactic garden-path effect. However, it was possible that verb bias alone could create a garden-path effect for patients with LIFG damage. Methods Two patients had lesions that included the LIFG while one patient had a non-LIFG (parietal) lesion. All were screened for good comprehension of single words and of active and passive reversible sentences. Executive control abilities were examined by three tasks: Stroop, picture-word interference, and recent negatives recognition memory (see Vuong & Martin, 2011). The sentence materials were drawn from Vuong and Martin (2014). Sentence structure was manipulated by including object/subject garden-path sentences and closely matched syntactically unambiguous control sentences (see examples). Prepotency of the garden-path interpretation was manipulated by including verbs biased towards the contextually inappropriate interpretation (i.e., transitive bias – e.g., “visit”) and neutral verbs (i.e., transitive and intransitive interpretations equally likely – e.g., “coach”). Garden-path: While the man/ coached/ the woman/ attended/ the party by herself. Control: While the man/ coached,/ the woman/ attended/ the party by herself. The three patients, and a group of eight healthy controls, were tested on two self-paced sentence processing tasks, using sentence regions as above, involving meaning interpretation (Experiment 1) and grammaticality judgments (Experiment 2). Results In contrast to healthy controls and the non-LIFG patient, one of the LIFG patients showed a deficit in meaning interpretation that was worse with biased verbs, across garden-path as well as syntactically unambiguous sentences (mean verb bias effect = 32.5%, which was 7 standard deviations above the control mean of -3%, SD = 4.6). She showed spared performance on grammaticality judgments. The other LIFG patient presented with a more severe executive control deficit, and showed spared performance only for grammaticality judgments in the easiest condition, namely the condition involving syntactically unambiguous sentences with neutral verbs (but not in the remaining conditions, including the corresponding condition with biased verbs). Conclusion The results add to prior studies in arguing for a role of executive control across diverse sentence processing situations, including overcoming verb bias preferences.
Reference Key
vuong2014frontiersthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Loan C. Vuong
Journal accounts of chemical research
Year 2014
DOI
10.3389/conf.fpsyg.2014.64.00044
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.