revisiting objective tests: a case study in integration at honours level
Clicks: 3
ID: 219887
2000
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #37 of 39 articles by views in anesthesiology research and practice
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Multiple-choice questions (MCQ) are widely accepted in the United States as a mode of assessment in undergraduate courses. In an environment of ever increasing class sizes, they provide a faster way to assess large groups of students, whilst also providing a way to measure deep understanding. However, in the UK there is scepticism from lecturers about the use of MCQ tests and, perhaps more significantly, from students themselves. This frequently means that someone using MCQs as a means of assessment will find both a lack of support from colleagues and resistance from students.
| Reference Key |
maclaran2000researchrevisiting
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Pauline Maclaran;Alan Sangster |
| Journal | anesthesiology research and practice |
| Year | 2000 |
| DOI |
10.3402/rlt.v8i2.11993
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.