estudo da equivalência entre as listas de sentenças em português study of equivalence among the lists of sentences in portuguese
Clicks: 280
ID: 218957
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
280 views
50 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #43 of 93 articles by views in journal of applied botany and food quality
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJETIVO: verificar a equivalência entre as listas de sentenças do teste Listas de Sentenças em Português, proposto por Costa em 1998. MÉTODOS: as informações foram retiradas de um banco de dados de um projeto de pesquisa. Foram selecionados 240 indivíduos que possuíam no mínimo o ensino médio completo, com idade entre 18 e 30 anos e apresentarem limiares de audibilidade dentro da normalidade. Os Limiares de Reconhecimento de Sentenças no Silêncio e no Ruído foram pesquisados em cada orelha separadamente através de fones auriculares. No Limiar de Reconhecimento de Sentenças no Ruído, fala e ruído foram apresentadas ipsilateralmente. RESULTADOS: ao comparar os resultados encontrados entre as listas, obteve-se uma diferença média de 0,03 dB NA a 0,86 dB NA no silêncio e de 0,04 dB NA a 1,06 dB NA no ruído. Observou-se também que os valores mínimos e máximos nas seis listas foram muito próximos. CONCLUSÃO: observou-se que na aplicação do teste Listas de Sentenças em Português, através de fones auriculares, tanto no silêncio como no ruído, foram obtidos resultados similares nas listas 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B e 6B, mostrando haver equivalência entre as listas.
PURPOSE: to investigate the equivalence among of sentence lists of the test: Lists of Sentences, in Portuguese, proposed by Costa in 1998. METHODS: the information was taken from a database of a research project. 240 individuals with at least complete high-school, 18 to 30-year old and having normal audibility thresholds, were studied. The Sentence Recognition Thresholds under Silence and under Noise were separately searched in each ear through earphones. In The Sentence Recognition Thresholds under the Noise, speech and noise were presented at the same ear. RESULTS: comparing the results among the lists, we find average difference of 0.03 dB NA to 0.86 dB NA under silence and 0.04 dB NA to 1.06 dB NA under noise. The minimum and maximum values in the six lists were very close. CONCLUSION: it was observed that in the application of the test Lists of Sentences in Portuguese, through earphones, both under silence as well as under noise, similar results were obtained in the lists 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B and 6B, showing equivalence among the lists.
PURPOSE: to investigate the equivalence among of sentence lists of the test: Lists of Sentences, in Portuguese, proposed by Costa in 1998. METHODS: the information was taken from a database of a research project. 240 individuals with at least complete high-school, 18 to 30-year old and having normal audibility thresholds, were studied. The Sentence Recognition Thresholds under Silence and under Noise were separately searched in each ear through earphones. In The Sentence Recognition Thresholds under the Noise, speech and noise were presented at the same ear. RESULTS: comparing the results among the lists, we find average difference of 0.03 dB NA to 0.86 dB NA under silence and 0.04 dB NA to 1.06 dB NA under noise. The minimum and maximum values in the six lists were very close. CONCLUSION: it was observed that in the application of the test Lists of Sentences in Portuguese, through earphones, both under silence as well as under noise, similar results were obtained in the lists 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B and 6B, showing equivalence among the lists.
| Reference Key |
santos2009revistaestudo
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Sinéia Neujahr dos Santos;Raquel Cristina Daniel;Maristela Julio Costa |
| Journal | journal of applied botany and food quality |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S1516-18462009000800016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.