comparação entre procedimentos de amostragem para espécies florestais raras e padrão de distribuição espacial agregado comparison between sampling procedures for rare forest species and aggregated spatial distribution pattern
Clicks: 190
ID: 217810
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
190 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #44 of 98 articles by views in journal of veterinary medical research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar procedimentos de amostragem para espécies florestais com populações raras e padrão de distribuição espacial agregado. Para isso, foi simulada uma população em uma floresta de 90 ha, subdividida em 100 unidades amostrais (N = 100) de 9.000 m² de área cada uma, apresentando número total de indivíduos igual a 44, a qual foi submetida a três procedimentos de amostragem: amostragem casual simples; amostragem sistemática; e amostragem adaptativa em cluster, com amostras iniciais selecionadas casual ou sistematicamente. Após as análises, verificou-se que a amostragem sistemática foi o melhor procedimento para estimar o número total de indivíduos da espécie em questão. Além disso, constatou-se a necessidade de investigar o efeito do tamanho e forma de parcelas, a escala de agregação e o tamanho da população, bem como suas combinações, sobre a eficiência dos estimadores da amostragem adaptativa em cluster.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the procedure adaptive sampling procedure used in forest inventories for species with low population density and aggregated spatial distribution pattern, in relation to procedures normally used in forest inventories. Thus, a population was simulated in a 90 ha forest, subdivided into 100 units (N = 100) with areas of 9,000 m² each, presenting 44 individuals of a given species, and submitted to three sampling procedures: simple random sampling; systematic sampling and adaptive cluster sampling, with initial samples selected through simple random sampling and systematic sampling. After analyses, it was verified that the systematic sampling was the best procedure to estimate the total number of individuals of the studied species. Besides, it was observed the need of further investigation on the effect of the size and form of plots, the aggregation scale and size of the population, and their combinations, on the efficiency of the estimators of the adaptive cluster sampling.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the procedure adaptive sampling procedure used in forest inventories for species with low population density and aggregated spatial distribution pattern, in relation to procedures normally used in forest inventories. Thus, a population was simulated in a 90 ha forest, subdivided into 100 units (N = 100) with areas of 9,000 m² each, presenting 44 individuals of a given species, and submitted to three sampling procedures: simple random sampling; systematic sampling and adaptive cluster sampling, with initial samples selected through simple random sampling and systematic sampling. After analyses, it was verified that the systematic sampling was the best procedure to estimate the total number of individuals of the studied species. Besides, it was observed the need of further investigation on the effect of the size and form of plots, the aggregation scale and size of the population, and their combinations, on the efficiency of the estimators of the adaptive cluster sampling.
| Reference Key |
soares2009revistacomparao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Carlos Pedro Boechat Soares;Christian Marques Rodello;Agostinho Lopes de Souza;Helio Garcia Leite;Vicente Paulo Soares;Gilson Fernandes da Silva |
| Journal | journal of veterinary medical research |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-67622009000300016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.