argentina: observatorios, veedurías o monitoreos de medios, un desafío de perspectiva, para una calidad de libertad de expresión
Clicks: 92
ID: 217117
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
27.3
/100
92 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #162 of 256 articles by views in food science of animal resources
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 256 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
El autor propone los medios más eficaces para realizar el trabajo de veedurías en los observatorios y narra las experiencias de Argentina en cuanto a los espacios de análisis y discusión acerca del accionar de los medios públicos y privados y acerca de cómo la legislación es desconocida por la mayoría de periodistas que se encuentran en la indefensión.
| Reference Key |
villafae2011chasquiargentina:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Miguel Julio Rodríguez Villafañe |
| Journal | food science of animal resources |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.