not to indict and non arraignment solutions, adopted by the prosecutor

Clicks: 2
ID: 216672
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #92 of 92 articles by views in turkish studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this paper are shown not to indict solutions adopted by the prosecutor as set out in the NewCode of Criminal Procedure, which amended substantially old regulation. We intend to analyze the dismissal and thhe withdrawal of the criminal proceedings asdecisions adopted by the prosecutor according to art. 315-316 and 318 of the New Code ofCriminal Procedure. According to the New Criminal Procedure Code, the termination of the criminal prosecutionrepresents the moment when all the investigating actions are fulfilled and the file is to beforwarded to the Prosecutor. By using the expression “termination of the criminal prosecution” we understand that it is thedecision of the bodies in charge with it regarding the fulfillment of all procedures necessary for thecase solution, in order to forward the file to the Prosecutor.
Reference Key
alexandru2016ovidiusnot Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Marian Alexandru
Journal turkish studies
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.