optimizing patient referrals to dental consultants: implication of teledentistry in rural settings

Clicks: 217
ID: 214871
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #29 of 52 articles by views in translational behavioral medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The uneven distribution of dental practitioners (particularly consultants – in Australia commonly called specialists) in Australia creates a barrier to accessing consultant level dental care. This maldistribution often results in the isolation of general dental practitioners (GDPs) practising in rural/remote settings, and the consequent lack of easy access to a second expert opinion from dental consultants. It then becomes challenging for GDP’s to weigh up cases that need consultant advice. This, at times, can contribute to under-referral or unselective referral of patients that require consultant advice, furthering the burdens on rural residents through additional travel and increased waiting times.
Reference Key
estai2016australasianoptimizing Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Mohamed Estai;Estie Kruger;Marc Tennant
Journal translational behavioral medicine
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.