electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health

Clicks: 212
ID: 214427
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #68 of 88 articles by views in materials & design

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems rather than the potential gains. Objective To evaluate the deployment of an EPR in a community mental health setting. Method A validated user questionnaire was issued to all clinically qualified staff working in community mental health teams followed by interview and validation phases. The study encompassed both quantitative and qualitative mechanisms to establish the efficacy and usability of the system. Results The questionnaire had a response rate of 49.3%. Overall, the response was positive, with almost no extreme negative responses. Of respondents, 88.5% were satisfied with system accuracy, while 91.7% of responses indicated that data was made available in a timely manner. Of those surveyed, 88.7% agreed the system was 'worth the time and effort required to use it'. Additionally, electronic notes are used more frequently than paper-based equivalents. Conclusion The research concludes that the implemented system appears to offer a robust EPR that gives its users a high degree of satisfaction and provides tangible benefits to clinical staff.
Reference Key
meredith2009journalelectronic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;John Meredith
Journal materials & design
Year 2009
DOI
10.14236/jhi.v17i4.739
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.