comparison of porosity assessment techniques for low-cost ceramic membranes
Clicks: 291
ID: 214101
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
291 views
68 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #41 of 111 articles by views in medicinal chemistry (shariqah (united arab emirates))
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Several characterization methods were applied to low cost ceramic membranes developed for wastewater treatment in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) and/or tertiary treatments. The membranes were prepared by four different procedures (uniaxial pressing and extrusion, both with and without starch addition to generate pores). The pore size of these symmetric ceramic membranes was measured by two different methods: bubble point and intrusion mercury porosimetry. A good agreement between both methods was achieved, confirming the validity of the bubble point method for the measurement of the mean pore size of membranes. Air and water permeations of these ceramic membranes were also studied. The relationship between the permeation of both fluids is consistent with the ratio of viscosities, according to the Hagen–Poiseuille equation.
| Reference Key |
lorente-ayza2017boletncomparison
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Maria-Magdalena Lorente-Ayza;Olga Pérez-Fernández;Raquel Alcalá;Enrique Sánchez;Sergio Mestre;Joaquin Coronas;Miguel Menéndez |
| Journal | medicinal chemistry (shariqah (united arab emirates)) |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.bsecv.2016.09.002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.