comparison of deformation behavior of 316l stainless steel and ti6al4v alloy applied in traumatology

Clicks: 166
ID: 214079
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #66 of 98 articles by views in journal of the formosan medical association = taiwan yi zhi

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The comparative analysis of mechanical properties was performed for AISI 316L stainless steel and Ti6Al4V alloy using the digital image correlation (DIC) method. Both types of materials are commonly used for implants in traumatology. Tensile tests of the cylindrical tensile specimens were performed at room temperature and at an initial strain rate of 0,0025 s-1. The strain analysis during tensile tests was carried out by means of Vic 2D image correlation software. Ti6Al4V alloy showed higher yield strength and tensile strength. The differences in the strain localization zones were observed.
Reference Key
losertov2016metalurgijacomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;M. Losertová;M. Štamborská;J. Lapin;V. Mareš
Journal journal of the formosan medical association = taiwan yi zhi
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.