whose nature? whose rights? criminalization of social protest in a globalizing world
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #46 of 65 articles by views in Molecular and biochemical parasitology
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
This introductory essay provides a reflection on the historical configuration of law and its relationship with nature's exploitation. In doing so, it seeks to highlight the epistemic foundations surrounding the criminalization of social protest in today’s globalized world. The essay revolves around the question of why the law has historically disregarded both environmental and social harm. Finally, the discussion concludes by suggesting a paradigm shift in the fields of criminology and legal theory.
Este ensayo desarrolla una reflexión acerca de la configuración histórica del derecho y su relación con la explotación de la naturaleza. Al hacer lo anterior se busca resaltar los fundamentos epistémicos en torno a la criminalización de la protesta social en el mundo globalizado contemporáneo. El ensayo intenta entender por qué el derecho ha excluido históricamente el daño social y ambiental. Finalmente, el análisis concluye sugiriendo un cambio paradigmático en criminología y teoría jurídica.
| Reference Key |
paez2014oatiwhose
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Gustavo Rojas Paez |
| Journal | Molecular and biochemical parasitology |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.