meningeomas: aspectos histopatológicos e recidiva meningiomas: histopathological aspects and recurrence
Clicks: 208
ID: 212431
1997
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
208 views
23 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #128 of 475 articles by views in communications in computer and information science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 475 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Os autores realizaram a avaliação de 246 casos de meningeomas que foram classificados como típico, atípico, anaplásico e papilar segundo critérios previamente definidos. Entre os critérios utilizados para definição de tumores não típicos, a invasão do sistema nervoso central predominou com 62,3% dos casos. Os meningeomas foram típicos em 75,22% dos casos, atípicos em 19,1%, anaplásicos em 5,68%. Houve recidiva em 3,78% dos meningeomas típicos, em 42,55% dos atípicos e 45,45% dos anaplásicos. Os autores concluem que os critérios utilizados para definição de típicos e não típicos foram adequados para predizer maior chance de recidiva tumoral.
The authors assessed 246 cases of meningiomas that were classified as typical, atypical, anaplastic and papillary, according to previously defined criteria. Among the criteria used to define non-typical tumours, brain invasion was predominant in 62.3%. Meningiomas were typical in 75.22%, atypical in 19.1 %, anaplastic in 5.68% of the cases. There was recurrence in 3.78% of typical, 42.55% of atypical and 45.45% of anaplastic. The authors conclusion was that the criteria used to define typical and non-typical were adequate to predict a higher chance to tumour recurrence.
The authors assessed 246 cases of meningiomas that were classified as typical, atypical, anaplastic and papillary, according to previously defined criteria. Among the criteria used to define non-typical tumours, brain invasion was predominant in 62.3%. Meningiomas were typical in 75.22%, atypical in 19.1 %, anaplastic in 5.68% of the cases. There was recurrence in 3.78% of typical, 42.55% of atypical and 45.45% of anaplastic. The authors conclusion was that the criteria used to define typical and non-typical were adequate to predict a higher chance to tumour recurrence.
| Reference Key |
hilbig1997arquivosmeningeomas:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Arlete Hilbig;Lígia Maria Barbosa-Coutinho |
| Journal | communications in computer and information science |
| Year | 1997 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0004-282X1997000300014
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.