bud structure, position and fate generate various branching patterns along shoots of closely related rosaceae species: a review

Clicks: 230
ID: 212218
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #545 of 793 articles by views in phytochemistry letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 793 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Branching in temperate plants is closely linked to bud fates, either floral or vegetative. Here, we review how the fate of meristematic tissues contained in buds and their position along a shoot imprint specific branching patterns which differ among species. Through examples chosen in closely related species in different genera of the Rosaceae family, a panorama of patterns is apparent. Patterns depend on whether vegetative and floral buds are borne individually or together in mixed buds, develop as the shoot grows or after a rest period, and are located in axillary or terminal positions along the parent shoot. The resulting branching patterns are conserved among varieties in a given species but progressively change with the parent shoot length during plant ontogeny. They can also be modulated by agronomic and environmental conditions. The existence of various organizations in the topology and fate of meristematic tissues and their appendages in closely related species questions the between-species conservation of physiological and molecular mechanisms leading to bud outgrowth vs quiescence and to floral induction vs vegetative development.
Reference Key
ecostes2014frontiersbud Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Evelyne eCostes;Laurent eCrespel;Beatrice eDenoyes;Philippe eMorel;Marie-Noelle eDemene;Pierre-Eric eLauri;Benedicte eWenden
Journal phytochemistry letters
Year 2014
DOI
10.3389/fpls.2014.00666
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.