‘modern arbitration legislation’: a comparison between australian and indonesian laws

Clicks: 99
ID: 211286
2012
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #59 of 79 articles by views in Health Communication

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) of Australia. In this research, the author finds the Model Law should be adopted by Indonesia to modernize the country’s arbitration law in order for it to more acceptable in the practices of international commersial arbitration to day. Furthermore, the adaption of the Model Law also assists to clarity the Indonesian approach to the appircation of public policy principle which can be used to resest arbitral awards in Indonesia.

 

Penelitian ini mempelajari Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 untuk mengetahui apakah hukum di Indonesia tergolong ke dalam aturan arbitrase modern dalam arbitrase komersial internasional. Penulis membandingkan Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 dengan International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) dan International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) di Australia. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menemukan bahwa Model Law dapat diadopsi oleh Indonesia untuk memodernisasikan hukum arbitrasenya agar dapat lebih diterima dalam praktek arbitrase niaga internasional. Diadopsinya Model Law dapat juga membantu mengklarifikasi pendekatan Indonesia terhadap aplikasi kebijakan publik yang dapat dipergunakan untuk menentang putusan arbitrase di Indonesia.

Reference Key
shahrullah2012mimbarmodern Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah
Journal Health Communication
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://mimbar.hukum.ugm.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/385
Keywords
jurisprudence lawlaw in general comparative and uniform law

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.