quality of venous thromboembolism diagnoses among prostate cancer patients in the danish national registry of patients
Clicks: 200
ID: 207375
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
200 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #22 of 42 articles by views in journal of industrial and engineering chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Aska Drljevic,1 Michael Borre,2 Morten Høyer,3 Vera Ehrenstein,4 Mary Nguyen-Nielsen4 1Department of Pharmacology, 2Department of Urology, 3Department of Oncology, 4Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Background and aim: It is well established that cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, no previous study has examined the quality of VTE diagnoses related to cancer patients in the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP). To support future studies on cancer and risk of VTE, this study aimed to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of VTE diagnoses among prostate cancer (PC) patients registered in the DNRP. Materials and methods: We conducted a validation study using data from hospitals within the Central Denmark Region, which covers a population of 1.3 million people. Using the DNRP, we identified a total of 120 PC patients registered with VTE within the period 1995–2012. We also identified a random sample of 120 PC patients with no VTE registration within the same period. Therefore, a total of 240 patients were selected for medical chart review. We compared data from the DNRP to data collected from medical record review (ie, reference standard). We then computed PPV, sensitivity, and specificity with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Jeffreys method. Results: The final study sample included 232 PC patients, of which 115 were registered with VTE and 117 had no registration of VTE in the DNRP. We found the overall PPV of VTE diagnoses in the DNRP to be 86.1% (95% CI 78.9%–91.5%). Sensitivity was 98.0% (95% CI 93.8%–99.6%), and specificity was 87.8% (95% CI 81.4%–92.6%). We also found the PPV of incident PC diagnoses in the DNRP to be 98.3% (95% CI 96.1%–99.4%). Conclusion: For PC patients, the registration of VTE diagnoses in the DNRP is associated with a high PPV. We provide evidence that data from the DNRP are valid for studies on risk of VTE among cancer patients. Keywords: positive predictive value, prostatic neoplasms, validation study, venous thromboembolism
| Reference Key |
a2014clinicalquality
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Drljevic A;Borre M;Høyer M;Ehrenstein V;Nguyen-Nielsen M |
| Journal | journal of industrial and engineering chemistry |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.