lung-protective ventilation strategies for relief from ventilator-associated lung injury in patients undergoing craniotomy: a bicenter randomized, parallel, and controlled trial
Clicks: 181
ID: 206834
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
181 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #154 of 363 articles by views in journal of aoac international
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 363 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Current evidence indicates that conventional mechanical ventilation often leads to lung inflammatory response and oxidative stress, while lung-protective ventilation (LPV) minimizes the risk of ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI). This study evaluated the effects of LPV on relief of pulmonary injury, inflammatory response, and oxidative stress among patients undergoing craniotomy. Sixty patients undergoing craniotomy received either conventional mechanical (12 mL/kg tidal volume [VT] and 0 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]; CV group) or protective lung (6 mL/kg VT and 10 cm H2O PEEP; PV group) ventilation. Hemodynamic variables, lung function indexes, and inflammatory and oxidative stress markers were assessed. The PV group exhibited greater dynamic lung compliance and lower respiratory index than the CV group during surgery (P<0.05). The PV group exhibited higher plasma interleukin- (IL-) 10 levels and lower plasma malondialdehyde and nitric oxide and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-10, malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, and superoxide dismutase levels (P<0.05) than the CV group. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic variables, blood loss, liquid input, urine output, or duration of mechanical ventilation between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients receiving LPV during craniotomy exhibited low perioperative inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and VALI.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (118 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
tang2017oxidativelung-protective
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Chaoliang Tang;Juan Li;Shaoqing Lei;Bo Zhao;Zhetao Zhang;Wenting Huang;Si Shi;Xiaoqing Chai;Chaoshi Niu;Zhongyuan Xia |
| Journal | journal of aoac international |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2017/6501248
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.