the role of the public in developing interventions: a reflection and critique of a cancer clinical trials unit’s model

Clicks: 84
ID: 205978
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #72 of 79 articles by views in the journal of craniofacial surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Jim Fitzgibbon,1 Jessica Baillie,1 Natalie Simon,2 Annmarie Nelson11Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales; 2Involving People, National Institute for Social Care and Health Research Clinical Research Centre, Cardiff, WalesAbstract: The importance of involving lay representatives in research is well-recognized but is not consistently meaningfully practiced or reported. Although the positive outcomes of lay representative involvement can include more relevant research questions and outcomes, challenges are also apparent, including tokenistic involvement by research teams. A Cancer Research UK-funded and National Cancer Research Institute-registered cancer clinical trials unit in the United Kingdom established a program of work to promote genuine and consistent involvement of lay representatives (or “research partners”) as part of the research team. Furthermore, a volunteer was employed to recruit and coordinate the research partners in partnership with a national agency for public involvement in health and social care research in Wales. This article reports on the development of this project and how it will be formally evaluated. Recommendations for involving lay representatives are also posed.Keywords: public involvement, lay representative, clinical trials unit
Reference Key
j2014patientthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Fitzgibbon J;Baillie J;Simon N;Nelson A
Journal the journal of craniofacial surgery
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.