corsair microcatheter for retrograde coronary chronic total occlusion recanalization: early experience outside the realm of dedicated recanalization specialists

Clicks: 284
ID: 204030
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #43 of 437 articles by views in renewable energy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 437 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: To determine the extent to which use of the Corsair microcatheter (CM, Asahi Intecc Co., Japan) improves procedural outcomes when an experienced operator who is not a dedicated recanalization specialist attempts retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization through collateral channels during percutaneous coronary intervention. Background: The recently introduced CM has improved success rates of retrograde CTO recanalization to nearly 100% in the hands of dedicated coronary recanalization specialists; however, the impact the CM has on the results of non-specialist operators attempting retrograde CTO recanalization is not known. Methods: A non-specialist operator attempted CM-assisted recanalization in seven consecutive CTO cases requiring retrograde recanalization. The results obtained were compared with those achieved by the same operator in eleven consecutive retrograde CTO recanalization procedures during the last 2 years before the CM became available. Results: CM-assisted retrograde CTO recanalization was successful in 6 of 7 cases (86%), but failed in one case attempted through a tortuous epicardial collateral; there were no complications. In contrast, during the 2 years before the CM became available, retrograde CTO recanalization was successful in only 3 of 11 attempted cases (27%), and was associated with significant morbidity. Lesions in the two groups were comparable in terms of technical difficulty and procedural risk. Conclusions: The non-specialist operator's retrograde CTO recanalization results improve significantly when using the CM. Given the effectiveness and safety of CM-assisted retrograde CTO recanalization, operators should be less aggressive with anterograde recanalization attempts, and should switch to the retrograde approach earlier and more often.
Reference Key
joseph2012indiancorsair Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;George Joseph;Viji Samuel Thomson;Shanmugasundaram Radhakrishnan
Journal renewable energy
Year 2012
DOI
10.1016/j.ihj.2012.05.003
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.