modalidades de regulação da atividade científica: uma comparação entre as interpretações normativa, cognitiva e transacional dos processos de integração social da comunidade científica modalities regulating scientific activity: a comparison of the normative, cognitive and transactional interpretations of the scientific community's social integration processes
Clicks: 216
ID: 203592
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
216 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #32 of 126 articles by views in current computer-aided drug design
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 126 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O artigo examina a questão dos padrões de regulação da atividade científica, por meio da análise do conceito de comunidade científica. Sustenta que a dimensão regulatória exercida pela comunidade científica sobre a atividade científica pode ser descrita a partir de três formas de interpretação do processo de socialização: a auto-regulação normativa, cognitiva e transacional. Para desenvolver este argumento, depois de uma breve introdução onde será contextualizada a especificidade do debate sobre a comunidade científica, inicialmente apresentaremos a interpretação formulada por Merton sobre o ethos científico. Em seguida, trataremos da interpretação feita por Kuhn sobre os paradigmas e, por último, consideraremos a interpretação proposta por Hagstrom sobre o modelo de troca. Para finalizar, apresentaremos algumas conclusões sobre o alcance e significado da noção de comunidade para descrição da atividade científica, por meio da comparação das contribuições dos três autores.
This paper explores the issue of the regulation patterns of scientific activity through the analysis of the concept of 'scientific community'. It advocates that the regulation exerted by the scientific community on its activities can be described by three interpretations of the socialization process: normative, cognitive and transactional self-regulations. To develop this argument, after a brief introduction contextualizing the debate on the scientific community, we present Merton's interpretation of the scientific ethos and go through Kuhn's interpretation of paradigms before considering the exchange model proposed by Hagstrom. We then present some of our conclusions on the range and meaning of the concept of community to depict scientific activity through the comparison of these three author's contribution.
This paper explores the issue of the regulation patterns of scientific activity through the analysis of the concept of 'scientific community'. It advocates that the regulation exerted by the scientific community on its activities can be described by three interpretations of the socialization process: normative, cognitive and transactional self-regulations. To develop this argument, after a brief introduction contextualizing the debate on the scientific community, we present Merton's interpretation of the scientific ethos and go through Kuhn's interpretation of paradigms before considering the exchange model proposed by Hagstrom. We then present some of our conclusions on the range and meaning of the concept of community to depict scientific activity through the comparison of these three author's contribution.
| Reference Key |
mattedi2010educaomodalidades
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Marcos Antônio Mattedi;Maiko Rafael Spiess |
| Journal | current computer-aided drug design |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0101-73302010000100005
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.