interpreting the x(5568)
Clicks: 75
ID: 202994
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
22.2
/100
75 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #219 of 265 articles by views in ACS chemical biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 265 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A variety of options for interpreting the DØ state, X(5568), are examined. We find that threshold, cusp, molecular, and tetraquark models are all unfavoured. Several experimental tests for unravelling the nature of the signal are suggested.
| Reference Key |
burns2016physicsinterpreting
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;T.J. Burns;E.S. Swanson |
| Journal | ACS chemical biology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.049
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.