synthesis and anticancer activity of new quinazoline derivatives

Clicks: 311
ID: 201767
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #13 of 117 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this study, a new series of quinazoline derivatives (3–26) was synthesized and characterized via physicochemical and spectral means. Treatment of 2-amino-5-methylbenzoic acid with butyl isothiocyanate resulted in the new 2-thioxoquinazolin-4-one (3). Alkylation and hydrazinolysis of the inherent thioxo group in (1–3) afforded the corresponding thioethers (4–23) and hydrazine derivatives (24 and 25), then 24 was further transformed into tricyclic derivative 26 via cyclocondensation reaction. Compounds 1 and 2, which were previously synthesized, were found to exhibit anticancer activity. The cytotoxicity of all compounds was evaluated in vitro against the HeLa and MDA-MB231 cancer cell lines, including 1 and 2 for comparison, using MTT assay. The treatment of the cells was performed with the synthesized compounds and gefitinib at 0, 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM and incubated for 24 h in 50% DMSO. The IC50 values of the target compounds were reported in μM, using gefitinib as a standard. Our results indicated that all compounds exhibited significant in vitro cytotoxicity against both cell lines. While compounds 1–3 showed good activity, compounds 21–23 were found to be more potent than gefitinib. Thus, compounds 21–23 may be potential anticancer agents, with IC50 values ranging from 1.85 to 2.81 μM in relation to gefitinib (IC50 = 4.3 and 28.3 μM against HeLa and MDA-MB231 cells, respectively).
Reference Key
abuelizz2017saudisynthesis Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Hatem A. Abuelizz;Mohamed Marzouk;Hazem Ghabbour;Rashad Al-Salahi
Journal International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Year 2017
DOI
10.1016/j.jsps.2017.04.022
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.