關於圖書分類法的修訂 concerning the revision of classification system
Clicks: 86
ID: 200471
1999
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
25.5
/100
86 views
11 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #34 of 124 articles by views in toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 124 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
無
For reviewing a classification scheme, we usually look in much detail at its traditional features such as detailed schedules, hospital notation, a supportive index and its adaptability. Yet another desirable feature, a good and financially secure revision programme, is a key point to the success of classification scheme. The author traces the history of revision processes of three successful classification systems (Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Universal Decimal Classification ), and attempt to recommend the better revision mechanism for Lai's New Classification Scheme for Chinese Libraries ( 中國 圖書分類法)in Taiwan
For reviewing a classification scheme, we usually look in much detail at its traditional features such as detailed schedules, hospital notation, a supportive index and its adaptability. Yet another desirable feature, a good and financially secure revision programme, is a key point to the success of classification scheme. The author traces the history of revision processes of three successful classification systems (Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Universal Decimal Classification ), and attempt to recommend the better revision mechanism for Lai's New Classification Scheme for Chinese Libraries ( 中國 圖書分類法)in Taiwan
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (90 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
chen1999journal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ho-chin Chen |
| Journal | toxicological sciences : an official journal of the society of toxicology |
| Year | 1999 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.