analphabetism in the 21st century and its legal consequences
Clicks: 58
ID: 200372
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
17.1
/100
58 views
10 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #51 of 83 articles by views in Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Every day we must note the main differences between well educated people and less ones. In fact,we can describe the human life like a continuous struggle between the pretensions: few people are to wellinformed, and the others cannot fulfill the same level. But these words are less important as conversation; thedifference is created by the modernization of the technology. In this case, population is forced to learn newskills, but there is, somehow, a real disproportion between the result: not everyone is able to learn well all thenew vocabulary, the new ideas of work and the new instruments of working, as computer or many others. Inthe same time, we must note that large categories of population, despite of free access to the education are nottrying to adapt to the modern provocations: more than that, they are not able to understand new ideas or newtechnologies. However, they live as normal persons, make juridical act and represent subject for juridicalreports. They are subjects of any branch of law, as the constitutions allowed. But this difference creates aquestion: can be a real gap between the ability to understand public or private law and its consequences?And, in this case, it might be possible to imagine some distinction between these kinds of persons? In ouropinion, next years might be able to introduce this subject on public debate agenda, and we must find – fromnow – an answer: the humanity of today is quite strange, and from this part of life surprises are always ready.The specialists of law cannot stay in former reality; they must imagine new provocations and new answers. Inour opinion, this direction is important for next years, and our text will try to find an answer for that.
| Reference Key |
vacarelu2011eirpanalphabetism
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Marius Vacarelu |
| Journal | Вестник Донского государственного технического университета |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.