pembatasan perkara kontra hak untuk banding
Clicks: 3
ID: 200215
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #16 of 16 articles by views in Aging cell
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Terjadi pertentangan antara kepastian hukum dan pemenuhan hak dalam suatu pembatasan perkara yang dapat dimintakan banding. Dalam pembahasan mengenai pembatasan perkara selalu muncul kritikan-kritikan dan penolakan. Tulisan ini mencoba untuk mencari jawaban atas perdebatan mengenai pembatasan perkara dari segi historikal, gramatikal dan prosedural. Dilanjutkan dengan pembahasan mengenai upaya-upaya, baik dari negara maupun dari masyarakat untuk mendorong pembatasan perkara demi tercapainya fungsi kasasi sebagai penjaga kesatuan hukum.
Kata kunci : pengadilan, banding, pembatasan perkara
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (72 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
prasidi2013arenapembatasan
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Dimas Prasidi |
| Journal | Aging cell |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2012.00502.3
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.