collective learning behaviour as a function of an individual's propensity for participative management and tolerance for ambiguity
Clicks: 154
ID: 199955
1999
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
154 views
22 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #49 of 109 articles by views in open access macedonian journal of medical sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this study the relationship between propensity for participative management and tolerance for ambiguity on the one hand, and collective learning behaviours - a particular form of participation - was examined. Three questionnaires measuring these constructs were administered on a sample of 283 employees in a financial services institution. A second order factor analysis yielded two second order factors for propensity for participation, one for tolerance for ambiguity, and three for collective learning behaviours. The three factors for collective learning behaviours served as dependent variables during a multiple regression analysis. Two statistically significant correlations were obtained during a canonical correlation procedure. The findings confirm that there is a statistically significant relationship between propensity for participation and tolerance for ambiguity on the one hand, and collective learning behaviours. The findings and implications are discussed.
Opsomming
In hierdie studie is die verband tussen bereidwilligheid tot deelnemende bestuur en verdraagsaamheid teenoor dubbelsinnigheid enersyds, en kollektiewe leergedrag - 'n bepaalde vorm van deelname - andersyds, ondersoek. Drie vraelyste wat hierdie konstrukte meet, is op 'n steekproef van 283 werknemers in 'n finansiele instelling toegepas. 'n Tweede orde faktorontleding het twee faktore ten opsigte van die bereidwilligheid tot deelnemende bestuur/ een faktor ten opsigte van verdraagsaamheid teenoor dubbelsinnigheid en drie faktore ten opsigte van kollektiewe leergedrag opgelewer. Laasgenoemde drie faktore het as afhanklike veranderlikes tydens 'n veelvoudige regressie-ontleding gedien. 'n Kanoniese korrelasie het twee statisties beduidende verbande opgelewer. Die bevindinge en implikasies hiervan word bespreek.
| Reference Key |
meyer1999sacollective
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;G. Meyer;C. Schmidt;G. Roodt |
| Journal | open access macedonian journal of medical sciences |
| Year | 1999 |
| DOI |
10.4102/sajip.v25i1.665
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.