efeitos do tratamento prévio com lidocaína, paracetamol e lidocaína-fentanil por via venosa na dor causada pela injeção de propofol: estudo comparativo efectos del tratamiento previo con lidocaína, paracetamol y lidocaína-fentanil intravenosos en el dolor causado por la inyección de propofol: estudio comparativo effect of pretreatment with lidocaine, intravenous paracetamol and lidocaine-fentanyl on propofol injection pain: comparative study

คลิก: 385
รหัส: 198534
2007
PDF ฟรี
คุณภาพบทความและตัวชี้วัดประสิทธิภาพ
คุณภาพโดยรวม
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
การประเมินคุณภาพโดย AI
ยังไม่ได้วิเคราะห์
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #27 of 139 articles by views in methods in molecular biology (clifton, nj)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 139 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
บทคัดย่อ
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Foi realizado estudo duplamente encoberto, aleatório, para avaliar a eficácia do tratamento prévio, por via venosa, com lidocaína, paracetamol (Perfalgan®) ou lidocaína associada ao fentanil na redução da dor causada pela injeção de propofol. MÉTODOS: Imediatamente após a oclusão venosa com torniquete de borracha foi feita a administração venosa de 4 mL de lidocaína a 1% (Grupo L, n = 50), 4 mL de paracetamol (Perfalgan®) (40 mg) (Grupo R, n = 50), lidocaína a 2% associada a 100 µg de fentanil (Grupo LF, n = 50) ou 4 mL de solução fisiológica a 0,9% (Grupo P, n = 50; grupo-controle com placebo) a 200 adultos. A liberação da obstrução venosa foi feita após 60 segundos, sendo seguida da administração venosa de propofol, 2,5 mg.kg-1 a uma velocidade de 0,5 mg.s-1 através de cateter 20G inserido na veia do dorso da mão. A avaliação da dor foi feita durante a injeção de propofol. Ela incluiu movimentos da mão, expressão verbal espontânea de dor, caretas e gemidos durante a injeção de propofol. RESULTADOS: Lidocaína-fentanil (70% sem dor) e lidocaína (68% sem dor) foram mais eficazes na redução da dor causada pela injeção de propofol do que o paracetamol (54% sem dor) e o placebo (36% sem dor) (p < 0,05). A diferença na redução da incidência de dor causada pela injeção de propofol entre a lidocaína e lidocaína-fentanil não foi significativa. O paracetamol foi muito superior ao placebo (p < 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: O propofol é um anestésico amplamente utilizado. Lidocaína e lidocaína-fentanil administrados como tratamento prévio, na forma de retenção venosa durante 60 segundos, antes da administração do propofol reduziram de forma acentuada a dor causada pela injeção de propofol, enquanto o paracetamol (Perfalgan®) reduziu discretamente essa mesma dor.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Se realizó estudio doblemente encubierto, aleatorio, para evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento previo, intravenoso (IV), con lidocaína, paracetamol (Perfalgan®) o lidocaína asociada con fentanil en la reducción del dolor causado por la inyección de propofol. MÉTODOS: Inmediatamente después de la oclusión venosa con un torniquete de goma, se hizo la administración intravenosa de 4 mL de lidocaína a 1% (Grupo L, n = 50), 4 mL de paracetamol (Perfalgan®) (40 mg) (Grupo R, n = 50), lidocaína a 2% asociada con 100 µg de fentanil (Grupo LF, n = 50) o 4 mL de solución fisiológica (Grupo P, n = 50; grupo control con placebo) a 200 adultos. La liberación de la obstrucción venosa fue hecha después de 60 segundos, siendo seguida de la administración intravenosa de propofol, 2,5 mg.kg-1 a una velocidad de 0,5 mg.s-1 a través de un catéter de 20G insertado en la vena del dorso de la mano. La evaluación del dolor fue hecha durante la inyección de propofol. Ella incluyó movimientos de la mano, expresión verbal espontánea de dolor, muecas y gemidos durante la inyección de propofol. RESULTADOS: Lidocaína-fentanil (70% sin dolor) y lidocaína (68% sin dolor) fueron más eficaces en la reducción del dolor causado por la inyección de propofol que el paracetamol (54% sin dolor) y el placebo (36% sin dolor) (p < 0.05). La diferencia en la reducción de la incidencia de dolor causada por la inyección de propofol entre la lidocaína y la lidocaína-fentanil, no fue estadísticamente significativa. El paracetamol fue significativamente superior al placebo (p < 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: El propofol es un anestésico ampliamente utilizado. La lidocaína y lidocaína-fentanil administrados como tratamiento previo, en la forma de retención venosa durante 60 segundos, antes de la administración del propofol redujeron significativamente el dolor causado por la inyección de propofol, mientras que el paracetamol IV (Perfalgan®) redujo discretamente ese mismo dolor.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Performed a randomized, double blind study to assess the efficacy of intravenous (IV) pretreatment with lidocaine, IV paracetamol (Perfalgan®) or lidocaine mixed with fentanyl in reducing propofol injection pain. METHODS: Immediately after venous occlusion with a rubber tourniquet on the patient's arm IV lidocaine 1% 4 mL (Group L, n = 50), IV paracetamol (Perfalgan®) 4 mL (40 mg) (Group R, n = 50), lidocaine 2% mixed with 100 µg fentanyl (Group LF, n = 50) or normal saline 4 mL (Group P, n = 50; as placebo control) was given to 200 adult patients. The release of the venous occlusion was done after 60s and followed by intravenous administration of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 at rate of 0.5 mg.s-1 through a 20G catheter inserted in hand dorsum vein. Pain assessment was made during the propofol injection. This included movement of hand, spontaneous verbal expressions of pain, frowning, and moaning during the injection of propofol. RESULTS: Lidocaine-fentanyl (70% pain free), and lidocaine (68% pain free) significantly reduced propofol injection pain more than paracetamol (54% pain free) and more than placebo (36% pain free) (p < 0.05). The difference in reducing the incidence of propofol injection pain between lidocaine and lidocaine-fentanyl did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant superiority of paracetamol compared to placebo (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol, a commonly used anesthetic. Given as a venous retention pretreatment 60 seconds before propofol, lidocaine and lidocaine-fentanyl were found to significantly reduce the propofol injection pain, whereas IV paracetamol (Perfalgan®) slightly reduced the propofol injection pain.
คีย์อ้างอิง
el-radaideh2007revistaefeitos ใช้คีย์นี้เพื่ออ้างอิงอัตโนมัติในต้นฉบับขณะใช้งาน SciMatic Manuscript Manager หรือ Thesis Manager
ผู้เขียน ;Khaled M. El-Radaideh
วารสาร methods in molecular biology (clifton, nj)
ปี 2007
DOI
10.1590/S0034-70942007000100004
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942007000100004
คำสำคัญ
anesthetics intravenous complicaÇÕes

การอ้างอิง

ไม่พบการอ้างอิง หากต้องการเพิ่มการอ้างอิง กรุณาติดต่อผู้ดูแลระบบที่ info@scimatic.org

ความคิดเห็น

ยังไม่มีความคิดเห็น เป็นคนแรกที่แสดงความคิดเห็นเกี่ยวกับบทความนี้