aspects of comparative law regarding the interceptions and audio or video recordings

Clicks: 144
ID: 196598
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #25 of 83 articles by views in Вестник Донского государственного технического университета

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The area of law-breakings for which can be disposed the interception and registration ofthe phone calls can be pretty wide. Therefore, in the case in which solid clues exist that one personwould have committed, as an Originator or Participant, law-breakings against the safety of theState, of high treason, or directed towards one land that jeopardize the international safety or thedefense capacity of the country, these measures can be authorized. The present piece of worksuggests a comparative analysis between national regulations and the international ones, in thematerial submitted to study, in the conditions in which we can notice, at the European Union level,a consolidation of the cooperation in the penal jurisdiction.
Reference Key
gradinaru2011eirpaspects Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Sandra Gradinaru
Journal Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.