no nos gustó: el transeúnte
Clicks: 2
ID: 196143
1965
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #709 of 711 articles by views in molecular medicine reports
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 711 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Entendemos nosotros la crítica de arte -especialmente la crítica literaria- como un intento de interpretación o valoración objetiva de una serie de elementos subjetivos. Porque aunque en ocasiones se preste para una confrontación de cuestiones objetivas -sería el caso de los análisis gramaticales en una obra- la crítica será siempre un encuentro entre algo subjetivo, como es la obra literaria, con una pretendida visión objetiva -como es su análisis- de otro elemento subjetivo -como es el concepto del crítico-.
| Reference Key |
pizano1965boletnno
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Daniel Samper Pizano |
| Journal | molecular medicine reports |
| Year | 1965 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.