ativação elétrica ventricular na ressincronização cardíaca caracterizada pelo mapeamento eletrocardiográfico de superfície ventricular electrical activation in cardiac resynchronization as characterized by body surface potential mapping
Clicks: 255
ID: 195998
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
255 views
58 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #87 of 230 articles by views in revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 230 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a ativação elétrica cardíaca usando Mapeamento Eletrocardiográfico de Superfície (MES), em pacientes com ICC e bloqueio de ramo esquerdo [BRE] submetidos a terapia de ressincronização cardíaca (CRT) com implante de marca-passo átrio-biventricular (MP-BIV). MÉTODOS: Foram analisados os tempos médios de ativação elétrica cardíaca no ventrículo direito (tempo médio de ativação do VD [mVD]), área ântero-septal (mAS), e ventrículo esquerdo (mVE), de 28 pacientes (idade média 61,2±9,5 anos, ICC classe III-IV NYHA, fração de ejeção <40%, BRE com QRS médio 181,2±19,4ms, SÂQRS= -8,5º±68,6º), mostrados nos mapas de linhas isócronas do MES, antes e após implante de marca-passo átrio-biventricular, e comparados a valores obtidos em um grupo controle composto de indivíduos normais [GNL], em três situações: (1) BRE nativo, (2) estimulação do VD; e (3) estimulação átrio-biventricular. RESULTADOS: situação (1): mVD e mAS foram semelhantes (41,0±11,8ms x 43,6±13,4ms), com mVE tardio (81,0±12,5ms, p<0,01) perdendo o sincronismo com o VD e a área ântero-septal; situação (2): mVD foi maior que no GNL (86,8±22,9ms, p<0,001), com maior diferença entre mAS e mVE (63,4±20,7ms x 102,7±20,3ms; p<0,001); situação (3): mVE e mVD foram semelhantes (72,0±32,0ms x 71,6±32,3ms), mVD foi maior que no GNL e BRE nativo (71,6±32,3ms x 35,1±10,9ms e 41,0±11,8ms; p<0,001), mAS se aproximou do GNL e BRE nativo (51,3±32,8ms x 50,1±11,4ms e 43,6±13,4ms). CONCLUSÃO: Pelo mapeamento eletrocardiográfico de superfície, tempos de ativação semelhantes no VD e VE e próximos daqueles da região ântero-septal indicam padrões de ativação ventricular sincronizada em portadores de ICC e BRE durante estimulação átrio-biventricular.
OBJECTIVES: To assess cardiac electrical activation by using body surface potential mapping (BSPM), in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacemaker (BIV-PM) implantation. METHODS: Mean cardiac electrical activation times were analyzed in the right ventricle (RV) (mean RV activation time = mRV), anteroseptal area (mAS), and left ventricle (mLV) of 28 patients (mean age 61.2 ± 9.5 years; NYHA class III-IV CHF; ejection fraction <40%; LBBB of mean QRS 181.2±19.4ms, SÂQRS -8.5º±68.6º), as shown in their BSPM isochronous maps, before and after implantation of atriobiventricular pacemaker, comparing those with values obtained from a control group of normal individuals [CG], in three situations: (1) native LBBB; (2) RV pacing; and (3) atriobiventricular pacing. RESULTS: Situation (1): mRV and mAS values were similar (41.0±11.8ms x 43.6±13.4ms), with delayed mLV (81.0±12.5ms, p<0.01) and asynchronous with RV and AS areas; situation (2): mRV was greater than in CG (86.8±22.9ms, p<0.001), with greater difference between mAS and mLV (63.4±20.7ms vs. 102.7±20.3ms; p<0,001); situation (3): mLV and mRV were similar (72.0±32.0ms vs. 71.6±32.3ms), mRV was greater than in CG and native LBBB (71.6±32.3ms vs. 35.1±10.9ms and 41.0±11.8ms; p<0.001), and mAS was close to CG and native LBBB values (51.3±32.8ms vs. 50.1±11.4ms and 43.6±13.4ms). CONCLUSION: The body surface potential mapping showed that RV and LV activation times which are similar, and are close to those of the AS area, suggest patterns of synchronized ventricular activation in patients with CHF and LBBB during atriobiventricular pacing.
OBJECTIVES: To assess cardiac electrical activation by using body surface potential mapping (BSPM), in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacemaker (BIV-PM) implantation. METHODS: Mean cardiac electrical activation times were analyzed in the right ventricle (RV) (mean RV activation time = mRV), anteroseptal area (mAS), and left ventricle (mLV) of 28 patients (mean age 61.2 ± 9.5 years; NYHA class III-IV CHF; ejection fraction <40%; LBBB of mean QRS 181.2±19.4ms, SÂQRS -8.5º±68.6º), as shown in their BSPM isochronous maps, before and after implantation of atriobiventricular pacemaker, comparing those with values obtained from a control group of normal individuals [CG], in three situations: (1) native LBBB; (2) RV pacing; and (3) atriobiventricular pacing. RESULTS: Situation (1): mRV and mAS values were similar (41.0±11.8ms x 43.6±13.4ms), with delayed mLV (81.0±12.5ms, p<0.01) and asynchronous with RV and AS areas; situation (2): mRV was greater than in CG (86.8±22.9ms, p<0.001), with greater difference between mAS and mLV (63.4±20.7ms vs. 102.7±20.3ms; p<0,001); situation (3): mLV and mRV were similar (72.0±32.0ms vs. 71.6±32.3ms), mRV was greater than in CG and native LBBB (71.6±32.3ms vs. 35.1±10.9ms and 41.0±11.8ms; p<0.001), and mAS was close to CG and native LBBB values (51.3±32.8ms vs. 50.1±11.4ms and 43.6±13.4ms). CONCLUSION: The body surface potential mapping showed that RV and LV activation times which are similar, and are close to those of the AS area, suggest patterns of synchronized ventricular activation in patients with CHF and LBBB during atriobiventricular pacing.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (93 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
pastore2007arquivosativao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Carlos Alberto Pastore;Nancy Tobias;Nelson Samesima;Martino Martinelli Filho;Anisio Pedrosa;Silvana Nishioka;Roberto A. Douglas;Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira;José Franchini Ramires |
| Journal | revista cubana de ciencias informáticas |
| Year | 2007 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0066-782X2007000300001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.