digital object in neonatal nursing: impact on student learning

Clicks: 91
ID: 195747
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #129 of 146 articles by views in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 146 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The study compared the cognitive learning of nursing students about clinical evaluation of premature, dividing them among those who used and did not use the learning digital object (LDO) as support material. Besides, it assessed the students’ opinion about the LDO. The quasi-experiment was conducted in the infant health discipline of a Nursing course, in which 22 students participated divided as control group (n = 10) and experimental group (n =12). There was no significant statistical difference between groups, but the intra-group comparison for performance demonstrated significant difference in both, showing positive learning effects. Regarding students’ opinion, very satisfying assessments were obtained about the digital object and its characteristics of interaction with the user. Although there was no significant impact between groups, the positive assessment from students’ use reflects its importance as innovative didactic strategy and motivation for the students.
Reference Key
aredes2015revistadigital Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Natália Del’Angelo Aredes;Fernanda dos Santos Nogueira de Góes;Marta Angélica Iossi Silva;Marlene Fagundes Carvalho Gonçalves;Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca
Journal Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
Year 2015
DOI
10.5216/ree.v17i4.34856
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.