two visual training paradigms associated with enhanced critical flicker fusion threshold
Clicks: 131
ID: 195621
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
131 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1,077 of 1,131 articles by views in accounts of chemical research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,131 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFT) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision training approaches (ULTIMEYES and directional dot motion) compared to an active control group trained on Sudoku. The three training paradigms were compared on their effectiveness for altering Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold (CFFT). Directional dot motion and ULTIMEYES training resulted in significant improvement in CFFT, while the Sudoku group did not yield significant improvement. This finding indicates that the two motion-related conditions (dot motion and ULTIMEYES) are effective methods for studying the role of low-level visual motion training on plasticity of higher order perceptual tasks, e.g. CFFT. The results and implications for potential future vision-based brain plasticity research involving high-order cognitive processes such as reading ability are discussed.
| Reference Key |
zhou2016frontierstwo
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Tianyou Zhou;José E. Náñez;Daniel Richard Zimmerman;Steven Holloway;Aaron Seitz |
| Journal | accounts of chemical research |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01597
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.