a comparison of type i error and power of bartlett’s test, levene’s test and cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
Clicks: 105
ID: 193127
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
105 views
41 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #88 of 95 articles by views in ferroelectrics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study compared the probability of Type I error and the power of three statistical tests (Bartlett, Levene and Cochran) by varying the sampling distribution, variances and sample sizes. Monte Carlo methods were used to generate responses based on sample sizes and distributions 1,000 times. The sample sizes were both equal and unequal: 15, 30 and 45. The data distributions were Normal, Gamma and Chi-square. It was found that Bartlett’s test was sensitive to the normality assumption whereas Cochran’s test and Levene’s test were robust when the normal assumption was violated. Moreover, Levene’s test was quite good for both equal and small sample sizes. In the case of power, Bartlett’s test had the highest power in all cases. When one variance was large, Cochran’s test was the best test. The recommendations from this study are that: Bartlett’s test is the best test for homogeneity of variances since it is not affected by sample size. When data are non-normally distributed, Levene’s test is a good choice for small equal sample sizes. Cochran’s test is best when sample size is large and unequal and one variance is larger.
| Reference Key |
viwatwongkasem2004songklanakarina
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Chukiat Viwatwongkasem;Thavatchai Vorapongsathorn;Sineenart Taejaroenkul |
| Journal | ferroelectrics |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.