las segundas partes sí pueden ser mejores: algunas reflexiones sobre el uso de datos secundarios en la investigación cualitativa the second parts may be better: some reflections on the use of secondary data in qualitative research

Clicks: 187
ID: 192862
2009
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #19 of 34 articles by views in bmc sports science, medicine & rehabilitation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
El análisis de datos secundarios es una de las estrategias más "antiguas" que los sociólogos han empleado para dar cuenta de fenómenos de la realidad social sobre los que se disponía de información elaborada por otros El presente trabajo tiene por objetivo establecer una reflexión sistemática sobre el uso de información secundaria en los procesos de investigación social cualitativos. El articulo consta de cuatro partes: 1.- hacia una definición de dato y análisis secundario; 2. ventajas y desventajas del uso de información secundaria; 3.- cómo, por qué y para qué re-usar información cualitativa, y 4.- algunas propuestas a modo de apertura de un campo de discusión. Abogamos por establecer criterios claros que puedan facilitar el uso y análisis de información elaborada por otros y/o en diferentes contextos de producción.
The analysis of secondary data is one of the "oldest" strategies that sociologists have used to work with the phenomena of social reality when the available information was prepared by others. This study intends to establish a systematic reflection on the use of secondary information in the processes of qualitative social research. The article is divided into four parts: the first works on a definition of data and secondary analysis; the second part discusses advantages and disadvantages of the use of qualitative information; the third asks how, why and what for is the reuse of qualitative information; and finally the fourth part presents some proposals for discussion. The aim is to establish clear criteria that would facilitate the use and analysis of information produced by others and/or in different contexts of production.
Reference Key
scribano2009sociologiaslas Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Adrián Scribano;Angélica de Sena
Journal bmc sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
Year 2009
DOI
10.1590/S1517-45222009000200006
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-45222009000200006
Keywords
qualitative research investigación cualitativa

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.