effectiveness comparison of channel-assisted mini-incision and open achilles shortening for treatment of healed achilles tendon rupture
Clicks: 145
ID: 192682
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
145 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #107 of 124 articles by views in frontiers in neurorobotics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 124 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness between the channel-assisted mini-invasion and open Achilles shortening for treatment of the elongated Achilles tendon following previous rupture. Methods The clinical data of 19 patients admitted from Dec. 2013 to Dec. 2015 and met the inclusion criteria were analyzed retrospectively. Eight patients were treated with shortening operation by channel-assisted minimally invasive repair system, while 11 patients received dissection of Krackow Achilles tendon shortening. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, injury to operation time, preoperative calf circumference and preoperative AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) score (P>0.05). Results The operation time, incision length and postoperative hospital days were significantly less in min-invasion group than in incision group (P<0.05). After operation, wound healing by first intention was obtained in incision group except 1 case which got infection and healed by treatment 2 weeks later. No sural nerve and vascular injury and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis existed. MRI showed that the Achilles tendon recovered in both groups at the 8th week follow-up. The patients were followed up for 12-17 months in the mini-invasion group and 12-20 months in the incision group. The calf circumference and AOFAS score of both groups were higher in the last follow-up than that in pre-operation (P<0.05), but no significant difference existed between the two groups at the last follow-up (P>0.05). Conclusion Channel-assisted minimally invasive Achilles tendon shortening operation has not only similar effectiveness to the incision shorting operation for the treatment of elongated Achilles tendon following previous rupture, but also has the advantages of shortening operation time and stay in hospital and avoidance of sural nerve injury.
DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2017.07.12
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (115 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
qi2017medicaleffectiveness
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Hong-zhe QI;Zheng-guo ZHU;Zu-hao CHANG;Hua CHEN;Pei-fu TANG |
| Journal | frontiers in neurorobotics |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.