comparison of glomerular filtration rate and chronic kidney disease prevalence using cockcroft-gault(c-g) and modification of diet in renal disease (mdrd for chinese formula among balinese population

Clicks: 197
ID: 192011
2015
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #61 of 151 articles by views in critical reviews in food science and nutrition

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 151 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Some community based study to determine the prevalence of chronic kidney disease has been conducted.It is reported that a reasonable rate of prevalence of CKD if calculated with different formula (either C-Gor MDRD). This  study  is aiming  to  compare estimated GFR and CKD prevalence determined byeitherC-G or MDRD  and the new Chinese modified MDRD formulaThis  study  analyzed  4528  subjects  from  7  areas  in Bali  Islands  including  219(4.8%)    subjects  inSembiran, 302 (6.7%), Denpasar 302 (6.7%), Nusa Ceningan 305 (6.7%), Legian282 (6.2%)  Blahbatuh3038(67.1%), Tenganan,  81(1.8%),  and  in Ubud  301(6.6%),  consisted  2217  (49%) males  and  2311(51%) females. It is found that there were a substantial differences and stepwise increase (79, 83, 86,and105 mL/min/  1.73 m2),  consecutively  of mean  of  estimated-GFR  if  calculated  by C-G, MDRD,MDRD for Chinese (if  non-Chinese), and MDRD for Chinese (if Chinese) formula. It was also foundthat differences of prevalence rate CKD using different formulas.  More than twenty percent (20.6%) ofCKD defined by estimated-GFR of 59 to 30 ml/min per 1.73m2 when were calculated by C-G,  and 6.9and 6.8 percent if were calculated by MDRD and  MDRD for Chinese (if  non-Chinese), consecutively,however, it is much lower (2.2%) using MDRD formula for Chinese (if Chinese).In conclusion, this study shows difference inmeanvalues of e GFR and  prevalence of CKD if calculatedusing  different  formulas. A  valid  formula  is  needed  for  specific  Indonesian  people.  [MEDICINA2014;45:151-155].
Reference Key
widiana2015medicinacomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal critical reviews in food science and nutrition
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.