perbedaan pendapat dalam putusan-putusan di pengadilan negeri yogyakarta dan pengadilan negeri sleman

Clicks: 120
ID: 191321
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #53 of 79 articles by views in Health Communication

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Judges may write a dissenting opinion in court judgments. However, this practice seems to be rarely observed in both civil and criminal cases at Yogyakarta District Court and Sleman District Court. From 2004- 2010, only 4 out of 6.634 court judgments are rendered with dissenting opinions appended.

Hakim dapat menulis pendapat yang berbeda dalam putusan pengadilan. Namun praktik penulisan perbedaan pendapat ini belum banyak diikuti di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta dan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. Perbedaan pendapat hanya terdapat dalam 4 putusan dari 6.634 putusan pengadilan selama tahun 2004 sampai 2010.
Reference Key
wijayanta2011mimbarperbedaan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Tata Wijayanta;Hery Firmansyah
Journal Health Communication
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://mimbar.hukum.ugm.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/59
Keywords
jurisprudence lawlaw in general comparative and uniform law

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.