a new review of old novae

Clicks: 9
ID: 190882
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #177 of 848 articles by views in BMC Bioinformatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 848 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Novae are certainly very exciting at the time of their eruptions, and there is much work left to be done in understanding all of the details of that part of their existence, but there is also much to be learned by looking at the systems decades, centuries, and even millennia after their peak. I give a brief overview of some of the history and motivation behind studying old novae and long-term nova evolution, and then focus on the state of the field today. Exciting new results are finally starting to shed some light on the secular behavior of post-nova systems, although as is often the case in astronomy, the observations are at times conflicting. As is always the case, we need more observations and better theoretical frameworks to truly understand the situation.
Reference Key
pagnotta2015actaa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;A. Pagnotta
Journal BMC Bioinformatics
Year 2015
DOI
10.14311/APP.2015.02.0199
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.