analisa yuridis terhadap model kewenangan judicial review di indonesia

Clicks: 143
ID: 190797
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #44 of 79 articles by views in Health Communication

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

One of the fundamental changes on judicial power in the third amendment of UUD 1945 is the distributionof judicial review power to Supreme Court and Constitutional Court. The Supreme Court has the highestjurisdiction to execute the cassation cases and authority to review inferior regulations under law. TheConstitutional Court has the power to review laws against UUD 1945. Unfortunately, the judicial reviewmodel has several potential problems which can ruin the implementation of legal principles. That is whysome changes have to be taken.

 

Salah satu poin mendasar dari penataan kekuasaan kehakiman pada perubahan ketiga UUD NRI Tahun1945 adalah dilakukannya pengaturan kewenangan judicial review atau hak menguji yang dijalankan oleh lembaga pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman, yaitu Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mahkamah Agung berwenang mengadili pada tingkat kasasi, menguji peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang, sedangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi berwenang menguji Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar. Namun ternyata model kewenangan judicial review semacam ini rentan melahirkan persoalan hukum yang dapat merusak pilar-pilar hukum, sehingga perlu dilakukan penataan ulang.

Reference Key
simamora2014mimbaranalisa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Janpatar Simamora
Journal Health Communication
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://mimbar.hukum.ugm.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/444
Keywords
jurisprudence lawlaw in general comparative and uniform law

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.