três tradições explicativas na lei da queda dos corpos
Clicks: 2
ID: 190394
1983
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #47 of 49 articles by views in hong kong journal of paediatrics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O presente trabalho tenta mostrar como na justificação teórica do estudo do movimento naturalmente acelerado nos Discursos, Galileu combinaria três posturas metodológicas não perfeitamente coincidentes. Seriam elas: a demonstração ex hypothesi da tradição astronômica, interpretada realistamente; a demonstração necessária da tradição aristotélico-euclidiana; a demonstração típica das "ciências intermediárias". Assim, mesmo a última obra de Galileu estaria longe de ser inequívoca em matéria de metodologia científica.
| Reference Key |
nascimento1983trans/form/aotrs
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Carlos Arthur Ribeiro do Nascimento |
| Journal | hong kong journal of paediatrics |
| Year | 1983 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0101-31731983000100002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.