pain measurement from the neurosurgical standpoint

Clicks: 156
ID: 189375
1991
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #215 of 475 articles by views in communications in computer and information science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 475 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A selective review of the current methods of pain measurement and validation (psychophysical methods, verbal and analogical scales, psychological tests) is presented with emphasis on patient selection for surgical pain relief, and analysis of outcome. The identification of homogeneous groups of patients with clinical and research objectives is prevented by the lack of a reliable pain scale, based on the assessment of objective and comprehensive parameters. This obstacle seems to be inherent to the complex nature of human pain experience. Psychiatric examination has proved important to elucidate the operative indications, particularly in cases of non-malignant obscure neuralgias. The importance of separate validation of the pain compliant and the psychiatric assessment is stressed. A critical comment is made on Hitchcock's pain scale and Lindqvist's psychiatric classification of candidates for surgery.
Reference Key
balbo1991arquivospain Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;R. J. Balbo;S. L. Rossitti
Journal communications in computer and information science
Year 1991
DOI
10.1590/S0004-282X1991000400001
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.